HiPERiSM - High Performance Algorism Consulting
How customers rate HiPERiSM's training for HC2
This table shows the ratings for the HC2 training course in January, 2004, at the Columbia University, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, IRI, NY, site.
The evaluation ratings are for a sample of N=10 with a rating scale Strongly Agree=5, Agree=4, Uncertain=3, Disagree=2, Strongly Disagree=1.
| Question | Mean |
Standard Deviation |
| The Instructor: | ||
| 1. Presented material clearly | 4.9 |
0.32 |
| 2. Encouraged student participation | 4.9 |
0.32 |
| 3. Managed class discussions well | 4.5 |
0.53 |
| 4. Responded to questions satisfactorily | 4.3 |
0.67 |
| 5. Was helpful during workshops | 4.5 |
0.53 |
| 6. Used available time effectively | 4.6 |
0.70 |
| The Facility: | ||
| 7. Was conducive to learning | 4.8 |
0.42 |
| 8. Terminal availability was satisfactory | 4.9 |
0.32 |
| 9. Computer response time was satisfactory | 4.9 |
0.32 |
| The Course: | ||
| 10. Prerequisites were valid | 4.7 |
0.48 |
| 11. Was well organized | 4.6 |
0.52 |
| 12. Length was appropriate | 4.5 |
0.71 |
| 13. Student materials were supportive | 4.6 |
0.52 |
| 14. Workshop supported course objectives | 4.7 |
0.48 |
| 15. Stated objectives were met | 4.7 |
0.48 |
| 16. Met my needs | 4.8 |
0.42 |
| Mean of each respondent's mean (1:16) | 4.7 |
0.30 |
| Mean of each respondent's Std Dev (1:16) | 0.40 |
0.18 |
HiPERiSM Consulting, LLC, (919) 484-9803 (Voice)
(919) 806-2813 (Facsimile)